UX / Design

Let us draw the arrows in Rewst. The intersecting arrows makes my workflow look cluttered and unorganized. Letting us draw the arrows would make our workflows pretty and organized.

Since noops are used for multiple different functions from Begin or Start statements to End statements it would be helpful to have some type of selectable iconography to go along with the function that is being used in that noop. A white play button on green for a Start/Begin noop A white octagon on red for an End noop An inverted white trident (Or even better a chicken's foot) to resemble a noop that's used for branching or filtering

Would be helpful to provide autoformatting for Jinja, similar to a formatter like Black for Python. Assuming that Rewst is using Monaco, https://microsoft.github.io/monaco-editor/typedoc/interfaces/languages.FormattingOptions.html there is API functionality that allows for custom format options. Even having the option in the context menu would be incredibly helpful. Might be too similar to this: https://rewst.canny.io/features/p/enhanced-live-editor But this in particular would make working in the live editor much easier for me personally.

There should be an option to change the Date time format in the form its currently on DD/MM/YY but we should have option to change it to the format we want like MM/DD/YY

There is already a feature to highlight multiple workflow steps, it would be amazing if we could take those multiple highlighted steps and on a right click convert to a subworkflow.

Would be cool to control the color of arrows connecting actions in a workflow based on custom controls for organization, ie on success being green, on fail being red, and a custom color selector for any other custom transition.

Hello Rewst Team, The user should not be able to see these "string" inside the form we want it to be clean This is something very important to make the UI clean also its irrelevent to the person who is filling the form. Please fix this as soon as possible

When working in a workflow, often times we need to do a couple of things in the loop before returning the value. In scripting/programming languages, you wouldn't always create a function to do some piece of logic, so I propose you shouldn't be required to do that in Rewst, either. My proposal would be to do something like what Power Automate does where your "with items" is a box you can drop other actions into and maintains access to the context.

I have a lot of workflows that run many times a day, sometimes many times an hours, to collect data, process jobs, etc. These tend to be simple, small and don't get updated often, so I don't need to see them on the Results page unless I'm specifically working on them. Unfortunately, the large number of results make the Executions page very hard to search, as well as causing it to grind to a halt when doing searches or filtering. It would be nice to be able to apply a "System" flag (similar to the System org variables) to hide them from the Executions page by default so they're not cluttering up the results. This would require the addition of a toggle to the Executions page to view them again, but I'm hoping that's not a huge lift.

I have a task that stretches vertically and its annoying when the streams cross. Being able to stack task transitions vertically would be cool