UX / Design

I don't think I've ever seen pagination implemented where it doesn't show you how many items or how many pages. You have no idea how many times you have to click > until you are at the end! Please add proper pagination that shows how many total records and some mechanism to show how many pages or to also jump to beginning/end. Thanks.

Under Workflows it would be nice to have a top level filter were I could pick the organization that I want to filter by. This would be extremely helpful when a clone is made because the clone does not update the field "UpdatedBy".

Since noops are used for multiple different functions from Begin or Start statements to End statements it would be helpful to have some type of selectable iconography to go along with the function that is being used in that noop. A white play button on green for a Start/Begin noop A white octagon on red for an End noop An inverted white trident (Or even better a chicken's foot) to resemble a noop that's used for branching or filtering

Let us draw the arrows in Rewst. The intersecting arrows makes my workflow look cluttered and unorganized. Letting us draw the arrows would make our workflows pretty and organized.

who has logged in, at what time, from what IP, what activity they did in platform, any edits made

Add a description field for workflows that allows free text to be entered. This could be a single line or multiple paragraphs explaining what the workflow is for, what it does, etc. Similar to what there is for forms. When reviewing complicated workflows that contain actions that run sub-workflows it would be great if, when hover the mouse pointer over the action, a tooltip message appears that contains the description text

I've got some workflows that have multiple triggers associated and I'd like to be able to have a quick way to tell which trigger caused a workflow to run, simply having a column on the workflow execution page should suffice.

It would be nice if we would be able to pass something to be displayed on the Status page. Its hard to dig through 1000 runs of a workflow 50 at a time when and having to look specifically for a time. If we could pass something that would be displayed along side the Succeeded/Failed status message something like Succeeded - PSA#7865764 Failed - 400 Error

Editing/viewing org variables is difficult when the value is more than a few characters long, such as a list. Can there be a text box that pops out sort of like you get in the workflow editor when editing a data alias? That way we could see larger blocks of text.

When working in a workflow, often times we need to do a couple of things in the loop before returning the value. In scripting/programming languages, you wouldn't always create a function to do some piece of logic, so I propose you shouldn't be required to do that in Rewst, either. My proposal would be to do something like what Power Automate does where your "with items" is a box you can drop other actions into and maintains access to the context.