UX / Design

The multi line text input is too small on forms, instead of the scroll bar it should wrap all of your input and the box should get bigger with your input. Users submitting larger submissions are having trouble reading all of the text at once.

Please add some kind of visual indicator to tasks that have multiple tasks pointing to it and the criteria sensitivity is set to 0. It is a huge pain to make sure you remember to update it in larger, complex workflows with many tasks.

I have a task that stretches vertically and its annoying when the streams cross. Being able to stack task transitions vertically would be cool

When looking at workflow's unpacked from a crate in the workflow view, the last updated field is only showing the date that someone in my organization made a change to the workflow. However if the workflow came from a synched crate and the crate was updated, the date change on the workflow is not updated. Case in point - The compromised User report is showing last update of 1/30/25 (when I unpacked it) but the crate version is showing 5/20/25 As this workflow in particular is synched, logically, the last update time should be the date of synchronization. Not only do I have no indication that the crate has been silently updated via a sync but I also have no idea when or what the changes were (which is a whole other issue).

I would like to see the ability to copy items when designing forms, both within the form and to other forms

When embedding a form the background is white and we cant control the title of the form. Allow us to make some changes to the styling during the embed, much like we can do by placing this in AppBuilder. Adding some variables to hide the title, set the background and text colors would go a long way to allowing the embed to actually be useful

Let us draw the arrows in Rewst. The intersecting arrows makes my workflow look cluttered and unorganized. Letting us draw the arrows would make our workflows pretty and organized.

When working in a workflow, often times we need to do a couple of things in the loop before returning the value. In scripting/programming languages, you wouldn't always create a function to do some piece of logic, so I propose you shouldn't be required to do that in Rewst, either. My proposal would be to do something like what Power Automate does where your "with items" is a box you can drop other actions into and maintains access to the context.

Would be nice to have a central location to view failures for all sub organization so workflows can be monitored for failures without having to search through each one.

We have some forms where we populate fields for users based on variables sent in from hyperlinks, or from option generators. It would be great if these fields could be marked as read-only and optionally greyed-out so they're visible but don't appear to the user as regular fields that they may try and change.