Employee Permissions
in progress
Kevin Clement
Allow employees to work within the managing org's workspace to create workflows for clients, but not have access to managing org's tenant.
Log In
D
Dan Knutson
in progress
D
Danial Gagne
D
Dan Knutson
Merged in a post:
Ability to publish specific forms to techs, rather than all forms or no forms
Jamie Moore
The MSP described the desire to roll out specific forms to engineers, without enabling all forms. They also want a way to easily make those forms, and only those forms easily visible to the techs, like by using our comprehensive forms link report, but being able to filter the forms that are shown
Tre Eiler
I've been asking for this for ages.
Sounds like App Platform is getting some level of granular permissions. I'd love to use the same concept with Forms so we don't necessarily need to always use app platform to limit access. This has been my main reason to hold-off on some concepts. While I could do a check inside workflows to see if the submitter is allowed to submit, being able to just straight block folks from forms is much easier for clients to understand. I've had a few freak out when an intern could fill an offboarding for a CEO, even though the workflow fails. Permissions would negate those UX/Client Experience issues.
Jay Edlin
More importantly limiting access to our own internal organization's forms. This is a huge security risk. It's not a matter of trust, it's about an overall security posture and the "least privilege" concept.
This could allow a compromised technician account or a disgruntled employee to take control of our resources.
This needs to be a priority. We are new here and for now I will need to make all of my technicians forms users. We can't take this risk.
Paul Antrobus
Agreed! Would be useful for us too so some customers could use certain forms without having access to anything else
Peter Pendlebury
Yes, absolutory need this!
Tim Wiser
This would be amazing